and not ignore it, just because it didn't happen in our area. It can still happen there too. I feel like he does a great job balancing logos, ethos and pathos. He mostly uses logos, but also ethos and pathos. He uses name calling and hasty generalization. I feel like he should have left out the logical fallacies or word them different, but then it wouldn't have been as effective. I think reading this before my persuasive paper would have helped me a lot. He wrote a very effective letter.
Kristina Hanson
No comments:
Post a Comment